<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It Rhymes With &#8216;Ding&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.engineworks.com/blog/2009/05/28/it-rhymes-with-ding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.engineworks.com/blog/2009/05/28/it-rhymes-with-ding/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon,  5 Jul 2010 08:34:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dape</title>
		<link>http://www.engineworks.com/blog/2009/05/28/it-rhymes-with-ding/comment-page-1/#comment-2515</link>
		<dc:creator>Dape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineworks.com/blog/?p=818#comment-2515</guid>
		<description>I would have thought microsoft would have been a bit more inventive for there search engine key name &#039;bing&#039;, however the more you say bing the bigger the thought becomes, &#039;lets bing it&#039;, &#039;bing it&#039; &#039;bing it on&#039;&#039;bing on&#039; &#039;bing O&#039; and so on. I like a comment that Bill Thompson made recently 
&#039;Microsoft is going to have to work very hard to penetrate the dense forest of thorns that Google has assiduously constructed over the years to protect the Sleeping Beauty of search in her fairytale castle.

Lets hope there is a happy ending for microsoft &#039;bing&#039; (&#039;but its not google&#039;)and the phrase becomes bigger than bingo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have thought microsoft would have been a bit more inventive for there search engine key name &#8216;bing&#8217;, however the more you say bing the bigger the thought becomes, &#8216;lets bing it&#8217;, &#8216;bing it&#8217; &#8216;bing it on&#8221;bing on&#8217; &#8216;bing O&#8217; and so on. I like a comment that Bill Thompson made recently<br />
&#8216;Microsoft is going to have to work very hard to penetrate the dense forest of thorns that Google has assiduously constructed over the years to protect the Sleeping Beauty of search in her fairytale castle.</p>
<p>Lets hope there is a happy ending for microsoft &#8216;bing&#8217; (&#8217;but its not google&#8217;)and the phrase becomes bigger than bingo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
